Publication of research is a necessary step in the dissemination and implementation of biomedical advances and plays a central role in the advancement of researchers’ careers. Through the manuscript review process, editors and peer reviewers act as gatekeepers of biomedical research. This process is not unbiased, though. During the review of biomedical manuscripts, animal-based validation of findings, although not always justified, is often requested or required. To assess this phenomenon, which we call “animal reliance bias in publishing,” we conducted a qualitative survey investigating the experiences and perceptions of researchers and reviewers. We describe evidence that animal reliance bias in publishing exists and can be based on editors’ and reviewers’ preference, familiarity, or narrow expertise. This leads to the evaluation of manuscripts not on merit (e.g., physiological relevance of the experimental model) but on irrelevant characteristics (e.g., a
reviewer’s preference for animal experiments), and contributes to the performance animal experiments for the sole purpose of appeasing biased editors and reviewers. Furthermore, this bias stands in the way of innovation and uptake of more physiologically relevant approaches such as human cell-based microphysiological systems and organoids, which have many advantages over the use of animals. Concrete steps to combat animal reliance bias in publishing may include broadening non-animal experimental model expertise on editorial boards and in reviewer pools, conducting anti-bias training, and establishing open peer review. Ultimately, a major shift in the perception of non-animal methods will be required for the advancement of ethical, effective biomedical research.
15:40-16:00 Panel Discussion with Clemens Wittwehr and Catharine Krebs
16:00-17:40 Session 2: Early Career Scientist share their research using NAMs
16:00-16:10 Julia Kühnlenz (Bayer CropScience Sophia Antipolis)
Abstract: A microfluidic thyroid-liver platform to evaluate chemical-mediated changes in the thyroid hormone system for humans
Thyroid hormones are central drivers of early development and metabolism. Recent regulatory developments demand a stricter investigation of putative chemical-mediated effects on the thyroid hormone system. In rodent studies one readout parameter are changes in the thyroid hormone levels, which can hardly be tackled by current in vitro assays. The human relevance of rodent-derived findings remains questionable. For this reason, we present a first proof-of-principle of a liver-thyroid coculture of the rat and human (1) to investigate species-differences, (2) to evaluate liver-mediated and thyroid-directed thyroid toxicities and (3) to implement physiological readouts in vitro. Our established thyroid models, thyroid follicles isolated from primary tissue, produced thyroid hormones over 21 days and presented the characteristic in vivo-like follicular architecture. Applying the thyroid hormone secretion as a readout, the TPO-inhibitory effect of the reference compound methimazole
could be simulated by our models. The liver models, 3D spheroids derived from the human HepaRG cell line or primary rat hepatocytes, demonstrated functional hepatic features e.g., albumin production and responded to phase I enzyme inducers in a species-specific manner. The rat model reproduced in vivo known increases of the hepatic thyroid hormone catabolism after the treatment with e.g., beta-naphthoflavone. These inductive effects were absent in the human model. To develop a system for detecting thyroid- and liver-mediated aberrations of the thyroid hormone system, we established a co-culture of the organ models in a microfluidic 2-organ-chip device. Similar functionalities as in single cultures were demonstrated. Most notably, we reproduced in a first feasibility study the detection of thyroid- and liver-directed thyroid hormone disruptions within the rat co-culture. This work demonstrates a first step towards a more physiologically relevant system to increase the precision of
extrapolating rat-derived in vivo data to the human outcome and provide an animal-free test platform for the human risk assessment.
16:10-16:20 Sabrina Madiedo-Podvrsan (Université de Technologie de Compiègne)
Abstract: Developing and investigating a new in vitro hepato-pulmonary coculture model for the toxicological study of inhaled xenobiotic
Urbanization and globalization are multiplying and complexifying pollution sources. Human exposure is acute and chronic, especially regarding widespread airborne particles. The socio-sanitary need to investigate associated risks to human health has propelled respiratory toxicology to the forefront. Meanwhile, current European research policies require to place animal welfare and predictive relevancy at the heart of scientific investigations. In this context, we describe a newly developed Lung/Liver (LuLi) in vitro coculture model which aims to recreate inter-organ interactions between a pulmonary barrier (route of entry of inhaled xenobiotics) and a detoxification organ such as the liver. The LuLi platform was characterized using acetaminophen (APAP) xenobiotic exposures to emphasize the passage and circulation of a model substance throughout the device. Two kinds of LuLi models are developed: a developmental model which allows the technical setup of the coculture platform, and a
physiological model which better approximates a human vivo situation. Following 72-hour exposures, both compartments metabolically respond to the imposed stress while remaining viable and functionalized. The developmental model highlights the presence of a relevantly active and functional lung and liver crosstalk: APAP has notable adverse effects on both compartments, which tend to be reduced under coculture conditions. This phenomenon could be linked to a detoxifying activity as the xenobiotic hepatic metabolism increases. The lung/liver crosstalk’s sensibility is being investigated thanks to the physiological model: despite low exposure concentrations, APAP metabolites continue to be detected by mass spectrometry within the circuit. This approach could be an alternative in vitro method to consider possible modulation mechanisms associated with systemic toxicity and could empower predictability accuracy within the framework of the toxicokinetic evaluation of inhaled
substances. Implementing such a systems toxicology approach would be a valuable tool to build more knowledge towards better hazard and risk management with regards to increasing global exposure to atmospheric pollution